Comparison

Sandwich nata sin azucares vs Mini sandwich vital

Overall, Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSandwich nata sin azucaresMini sandwich vital
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group — —
Calories 217 kcal 305 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 7.8 g
Saturated fat 3.8 g 7.1 g
Sugars 5.2 g 4.8 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 g
Protein 5.4 g 5.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sandwich nata sin azucares has 29% fewer calories (217 kcal vs 305 kcal).
  • Sandwich nata sin azucares has 18% less fat (6.4 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Sandwich nata sin azucares has 46% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Sandwich nata sin azucares

Not available.

Mini sandwich vital

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sandwich nata sin azucares or Mini sandwich vital?

Overall, Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sandwich nata sin azucares has fewer calories: 217 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mini sandwich vital has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons