Sandwich nata sin azucares vs Mini sandwich vital
Overall, Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sandwich nata sin azucares | Mini sandwich vital |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 217 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Sugars | 5.2 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 5.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sandwich nata sin azucares has 29% fewer calories (217 kcal vs 305 kcal).
- Sandwich nata sin azucares has 18% less fat (6.4 g vs 7.8 g).
- Sandwich nata sin azucares has 46% less saturated fat (3.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sandwich nata sin azucares
Not available.
Mini sandwich vital
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sandwich nata sin azucares or Mini sandwich vital?
Overall, Sandwich nata sin azucares has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sandwich nata sin azucares has fewer calories: 217 kcal versus 305 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mini sandwich vital has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.