Comparison
Sana vs Sana 330g covalact
Overall, Sana 330g covalact has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sana | Sana 330g covalact |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sana 330g covalact has 20% less sugar (3.6 g vs 4.5 g).
- Only Sana lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Sana
Lapte de vacă pasteurizat, proteine din lapte, culturi lactice selecţionate
Sana 330g covalact
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sana or Sana 330g covalact?
Overall, Sana 330g covalact has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sana 330g covalact has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sana 330g covalact has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.