Sana vs Napolact Sana 3,5 %
Overall, Napolact Sana 3,5 % has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sana | Napolact Sana 3,5 % |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Napolact Sana 3,5 % has 18% less sugar (3.7 g vs 4.5 g).
- Napolact Sana 3,5 % is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sana
Lapte de vacă pasteurizat, proteine din lapte, culturi lactice selecţionate
Napolact Sana 3,5 %
Lapte de vaca pasteurizat la temperatura inalta, culturi lactice selectionate,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sana or Napolact Sana 3,5 %?
Overall, Napolact Sana 3,5 % has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Napolact Sana 3,5 % has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Napolact Sana 3,5 % has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.