Comparison
Sana bio vs Sana 330g covalact
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sana bio | Sana 330g covalact |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 59 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Sana bio
Not available.
Sana 330g covalact
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sana bio or Sana 330g covalact?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sana bio has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sana 330g covalact has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.