Salami de boeuf vs Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salami de boeuf | Salami de boeuf avec viande... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 320 kcal | 302 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 25 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 10.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salami de boeuf has 19% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 10.3 g).
- Salami de boeuf has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet has no salt, while Salami de boeuf has 3.3 g.
- Salami de boeuf has 28% more protein (25 g vs 18 g).
- Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salami de boeuf
96% viande de bœuf, sel nitrité pour saumure (sel de cuisine, conservateur: nitrite de sodium), épices, condiments, glucose, sirop de glucose, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium; sucre, extraits d'épices. : لا
Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet
Viande de boeuf, viande de poulet, graisse de viande boeuf, sel nitrité iodé (sel de cuisine, conservateur : E250, iodate de potassium), dextrose, épices, sucre, assaisonnement (issue de colza), antioxygènes : E300, E301, colorant : E310, ferments, fumage au bois de hêtre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salami de boeuf or Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salami de boeuf avec viande de poulet has fewer calories: 302 kcal versus 320 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salami de boeuf has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.