Comparison

Salade impériale vs Salade de crabe

Overall, Salade de crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade impérialeSalade de crabe
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 390 kcal 403 kcal
Fat 38 g 40 g
Saturated fat 3 g 3.8 g
Sugars 2 g 1.5 g
Salt 2 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 6.1 g 8 g
Additives10
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade impériale has 21% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Salade de crabe has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Salade de crabe has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
  • Salade de crabe has 24% more protein (8 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Only Salade impériale lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Salade impériale

à tatrv à = Fuie 11 S, BLF hOJT4.mE t«raye, gare se, AD-e, 0,06-LISQE, R.STACE, mare, ie,u-e) — SOJA tu e = aa&fiais Ea - E41S E40 EZ2 - E211 , EQI - E - El ay iat 40C

Salade de crabe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade impériale or Salade de crabe?

Overall, Salade de crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade impériale has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de crabe has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons