Comparison

Salade impériale vs Salade de Surimu et crabe

Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade impérialeSalade de Surimu et crabe
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 390 kcal 316 kcal
Fat 38 g 28.8 g
Saturated fat 3 g 2.5 g
Sugars 2 g 1.7 g
Salt 2 g 1.8 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 6.1 g 7.2 g
Additives10
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 19% fewer calories (316 kcal vs 390 kcal).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 24% less fat (28.8 g vs 38 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 17% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.1 g).
  • Only Salade impériale lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Salade impériale

à tatrv à = Fuie 11 S, BLF hOJT4.mE t«raye, gare se, AD-e, 0,06-LISQE, R.STACE, mare, ie,u-e) — SOJA tu e = aa&fiais Ea - E41S E40 EZ2 - E211 , EQI - E - El ay iat 40C

Salade de Surimu et crabe

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade impériale or Salade de Surimu et crabe?

Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade de Surimu et crabe has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de Surimu et crabe has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons