Salade de Surimu et crabe vs Salade de crabe royale
Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade de Surimu et crabe | Salade de crabe royale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 316 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 28.8 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade de Surimu et crabe has 19% fewer calories (316 kcal vs 390 kcal).
- Salade de Surimu et crabe has 24% less fat (28.8 g vs 38 g).
- Salade de Surimu et crabe has 17% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
- Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
Salade de Surimu et crabe
Not available.
Salade de crabe royale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade de Surimu et crabe or Salade de crabe royale?
Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade de Surimu et crabe has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade de Surimu et crabe has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.