Comparison

Salade de Surimu et crabe vs Salade de crabe royale

Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade de Surimu et crabeSalade de crabe royale
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — —
Calories 316 kcal 390 kcal
Fat 28.8 g 38 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 3 g
Sugars 1.7 g 2 g
Salt 1.8 g 2 g
Protein 7.2 g 6.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 19% fewer calories (316 kcal vs 390 kcal).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 24% less fat (28.8 g vs 38 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 17% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
  • Salade de Surimu et crabe has 15% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.1 g).

Ingredients

Salade de Surimu et crabe

Not available.

Salade de crabe royale

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade de Surimu et crabe or Salade de crabe royale?

Overall, Salade de Surimu et crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salade de Surimu et crabe has fewer calories: 316 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade de Surimu et crabe has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons