Salade de crabe vs Salade de crabe royale
Overall, Salade de crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salade de crabe | Salade de crabe royale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 390 kcal |
| Fat | 40 g | 38 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 6.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salade de crabe royale has 21% less saturated fat (3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Salade de crabe has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
- Salade de crabe has 40% less salt (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Salade de crabe has 24% more protein (8 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
Salade de crabe
Not available.
Salade de crabe royale
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salade de crabe or Salade de crabe royale?
Overall, Salade de crabe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salade de crabe royale has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salade de crabe has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.