Comparison

Salade & Apéritif vs Préparation de fromage fondu

Overall, Salade & Apéritif has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalade & ApéritifPréparation de fromage fondu
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 352 kcal 238 kcal
Fat 33 g 18 g
Saturated fat 22 g 12 g
Sugars 2.3 g 5 g
Salt 1.4 g 2.3 g
Fiber 1.6 g 0 g
Protein 8.4 g 14 g
Additives23
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Préparation de fromage fondu has 32% fewer calories (238 kcal vs 352 kcal).
  • Préparation de fromage fondu has 45% less fat (18 g vs 33 g).
  • Préparation de fromage fondu has 45% less saturated fat (12 g vs 22 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has 54% less sugar (2.3 g vs 5 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has 39% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has 100% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0 g).
  • Préparation de fromage fondu has 40% more protein (14 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salade & Apéritif

_Lait_ pasteurisé de vache (origine France), _crème_ pasteurisée de vache (origine France), protéines de _lait_, sel, amidon modifié de tapioca, ail déshydraté 1.06%, persil déshydraté 0,15%, poivre, conservateur : acide sorbique, ferments _lactiques_, ciboulette déshydratée 0,01%.

Préparation de fromage fondu

fromage 43%, eau, lait écrémé en poudre, beurre, sels de fonte: E339, E450 et E452

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salade & Apéritif or Préparation de fromage fondu?

Overall, Salade & Apéritif has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Préparation de fromage fondu has fewer calories: 238 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salade & Apéritif has less sugar: 2.3 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons