Comparison

Brat und Grill Taler Klassik vs Salade & Apéritif

Overall, Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBrat und Grill Taler KlassikSalade & Apéritif
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 327 kcal 352 kcal
Fat 25 g 33 g
Saturated fat 16.2 g 22 g
Sugars 0.2 g 2.3 g
Salt 1.3 g 1.4 g
Fiber 1 g 1.6 g
Protein 24 g 8.4 g
Additives32
AllergensEggs, MilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has 24% less fat (25 g vs 33 g).
  • Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has 26% less saturated fat (16.2 g vs 22 g).
  • Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has 91% less sugar (0.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has 38% more fiber (1.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has 65% more protein (24 g vs 8.4 g).
  • Salade & Apéritif has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Brat und Grill Taler Klassik lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Brat und Grill Taler Klassik

48% Käse*, 40% Gouda*, Hühnereieiweißpulver**, modifizierte Stärke Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl, Methylcellulose.

Salade & Apéritif

_Lait_ pasteurisé de vache (origine France), _crème_ pasteurisée de vache (origine France), protéines de _lait_, sel, amidon modifié de tapioca, ail déshydraté 1.06%, persil déshydraté 0,15%, poivre, conservateur : acide sorbique, ferments _lactiques_, ciboulette déshydratée 0,01%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Brat und Grill Taler Klassik or Salade & Apéritif?

Overall, Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has fewer calories: 327 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Brat und Grill Taler Klassik has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons