Comparison
Sait-marcellin vs Saint marcellin
Overall, Sait-marcellin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sait-marcellin | Saint marcellin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 275 kcal | 275 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sait-marcellin has 25% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Sait-marcellin
Not available.
Saint marcellin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sait-marcellin or Saint marcellin?
Overall, Sait-marcellin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sait-marcellin has fewer calories: 275 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sait-marcellin has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.