Sait-marcellin vs St marcelin
Overall, St marcelin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sait-marcellin | St marcelin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 275 kcal | 258 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- St marcelin has 11% less saturated fat (16 g vs 18 g).
- Only St marcelin lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Sait-marcellin
Not available.
St marcelin
Frcmcge au lait de vache thermisé à 10 pasteurisation : lait de vache (origine France), seltuésuret et d'affinage. Produit suiet à dessiccatin cc,tserver entre +2 oc et +6 oc.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sait-marcellin or St marcelin?
Overall, St marcelin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
St marcelin has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 275 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
St marcelin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.