Comparison
Sagardoa vs Secco Bianco
Overall, Sagardoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sagardoa | Secco Bianco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10.1 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Secco Bianco has 55% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 49 kcal).
- Sagardoa has 74% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Secco Bianco has 61% less sugar (3.9 g vs 10.1 g).
- Sagardoa has 100% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0 g).
- Sagardoa has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Sagardoa
100% zumo de manzana fermentado. No contiene sulfitos añadido
Secco Bianco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sagardoa or Secco Bianco?
Overall, Sagardoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Secco Bianco has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Secco Bianco has less sugar: 3.9 g versus 10.1 g per 100 g.