Comparison

Saftige ostegrillpølser vs Rødvinspølse

Overall, Saftige ostegrillpølser has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSaftige ostegrillpølserRødvinspølse
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 231 kcal 491 kcal
Fat 18 g 44 g
Saturated fat 7 g 16 g
Sugars 0.4 g 1 g
Salt 1.8 g 5.4 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 11 g 23 g
Additives62
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has 53% fewer calories (231 kcal vs 491 kcal).
  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has 59% less fat (18 g vs 44 g).
  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has 56% less saturated fat (7 g vs 16 g).
  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has 67% less salt (1.8 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Rødvinspølse has 52% more protein (23 g vs 11 g).
  • Saftige ostegrillpølser has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Saftige ostegrillpølser

Kjøtt av svin og storfe (49%), vann, hvitost (Jarlsbergost) (7%), hodekjøtt av svin, potetmel, salt, krydder, dekstrose, surhetsregulerende middel E508, stabilisator E451, antioksidant E315, konserveringsmiddel E261, E326, E250.

Rødvinspølse

Storfekjøtt, spekk, svinehjerte, svinetunge, svinekjøtt, salt, rødvin, bestrålt krydder, konserveringsmiddel (natriumnitritt E250), antioksidant (askorbinsyre E300), startkultur og farge (karmin E120). Rekt med bøk. Kjøttinnhold ferdig vare: 87 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Saftige ostegrillpølser or Rødvinspølse?

Overall, Saftige ostegrillpølser has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Saftige ostegrillpølser has fewer calories: 231 kcal versus 491 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saftige ostegrillpølser has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons