Comparison
Safranfäden vs Zaffy
Overall, Zaffy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Safranfäden | Zaffy |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 409 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 8.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 42.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 3.9 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Safranfäden has 14% fewer calories (352 kcal vs 409 kcal).
- Safranfäden has 28% less fat (5.9 g vs 8.1 g).
- Zaffy has 25% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 1.6 g).
- Zaffy has 97% less sugar (1.3 g vs 42.4 g).
- Safranfäden has 77% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
- Zaffy has 34% more fiber (5.9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Zaffy has 24% more protein (15 g vs 11.4 g).
Ingredients
Safranfäden
Safran
Zaffy
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Safranfäden or Zaffy?
Overall, Zaffy has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Safranfäden has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zaffy has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 42.4 g per 100 g.