Rustica vs Frites saus classic
Overall, Rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rustica | Frites saus classic |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 503 kcal | 300 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.4 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 10 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 5.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Frites saus classic has 40% fewer calories (300 kcal vs 503 kcal).
- Frites saus classic has 79% less saturated fat (2 g vs 9.4 g).
- Rustica has 94% less sugar (0.6 g vs 10 g).
- Rustica has 35% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Rustica has 99% more fiber (5.4 g vs 0.1 g).
- Rustica has 91% more protein (7.4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Rustica is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Frites saus classic lists: Eggs, Mustard.
Ingredients
Rustica
Patate, oli vegetali (palma, girasole alto oleico), sale. Può contenere latte, senape, soia e sedano.
Frites saus classic
water, raapolie, glucosefructosestroop, azijn, maiszetmeel, MOSTERD (water, MOSTERDZADEN, azijn, specerijen), suiker, vrije uitloop EIGEEL, zout, gemodificeerd maiszetmeel, voedingszuur: citroenzuur, verdikkingsmiddel: guarpitmeel, conserveermiddel: kaliumsorbaat, aroma, antioxidant: calciumdinatrium-EDTA, kleurstof: betacaroteen
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rustica or Frites saus classic?
Overall, Rustica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Frites saus classic has fewer calories: 300 kcal versus 503 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rustica has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 10 g per 100 g.