Roucoulons Portions vs Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg
Overall, Roucoulons Portions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roucoulons Portions | Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 19.7 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 18.5 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has 15% fewer calories (294 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has 13% less fat (26 g vs 30 g).
- Roucoulons Portions has 55% less salt (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Roucoulons Portions has 19% more protein (18.5 g vs 15 g).
- Roucoulons Portions has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Roucoulons Portions
Fromage à pâte molle au Lait de vache pasteurisé,sel et ferments lactiques
Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg
Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, biologique présure. culture, bactérienne, E509
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roucoulons Portions or Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg?
Overall, Roucoulons Portions has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has fewer calories: 294 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.