Comparison
Petit Mont Bebour vs Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg
Overall, Petit Mont Bebour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petit Mont Bebour | Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 346 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has 15% fewer calories (294 kcal vs 346 kcal).
- Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has 13% less fat (26 g vs 30 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has 57% less salt (1.3 g vs 3 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has 21% more protein (19 g vs 15 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Petit Mont Bebour
Not available.
Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg
Lait de vache pasteurisé, sel, biologique présure. culture, bactérienne, E509
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petit Mont Bebour or Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg?
Overall, Petit Mont Bebour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ciftlik Peyniri 1.5kg has fewer calories: 294 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit Mont Bebour has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.