Comparison
Chaource vs Roucoulons Portions
Overall, Chaource has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chaource | Roucoulons Portions |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.8 g | 19.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 18.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chaource has 22% fewer calories (270 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Chaource has 27% less fat (22 g vs 30 g).
- Chaource has 20% less saturated fat (15.8 g vs 19.7 g).
- Roucoulons Portions has 80% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Roucoulons Portions has 31% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Chaource
_Lait_ thermisé.
Roucoulons Portions
Fromage à pâte molle au Lait de vache pasteurisé,sel et ferments lactiques
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chaource or Roucoulons Portions?
Overall, Chaource has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chaource has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Roucoulons Portions has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.