Rôti de veau farci aux olives vs Rôti de veau
Overall, Rôti de veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rôti de veau farci aux olive... | Rôti de veau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 247 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 4.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 10 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rôti de veau has 53% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 247 kcal).
- Rôti de veau has 78% less fat (4.6 g vs 21 g).
- Rôti de veau has 72% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 7.8 g).
- Rôti de veau has no sugar, while Rôti de veau farci aux olives has 0.4 g.
- Rôti de veau has 75% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rôti de veau has 42% more protein (19 g vs 11 g).
- Rôti de veau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Rôti de veau is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rôti de veau farci aux olives lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Rôti de veau farci aux olives
45% escalope de viande reconstituée (22% viande de veau (Origine: France), 20% eau, gélifiants: alginate de sodium, sulfate de calcium, diphosphate tetrasodique; acidifiants: lactate de potassium, acétates de sodium; dextrose, antioxydant: ascorbate de sodium), 45% farce (23% viande de veau (Origine: France), 11% eau, gras de veau, gras de porc, chapelure (farine de blé, sel, poudre à lever: carbonate acide d'ammonium), 2% protéine de soja, 2% olives, dextrose, arômes naturels, épices, extrait d'épices, arômes, antioxydants: acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium; acidifiants: acide citrique, lactate de potassium, acétates de sodium), 10% barde de porc. Traces éventuelles de lait et d'œufs.
Rôti de veau
Veau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rôti de veau farci aux olives or Rôti de veau?
Overall, Rôti de veau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rôti de veau has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 247 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rôti de veau has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.