Rotella vs Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g
Overall, Rotella has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rotella | Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastill... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 38 g | 94.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rotella has 25% fewer calories (298 kcal vs 397 kcal).
- Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Rotella has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Rotella has 60% less sugar (38 g vs 94.5 g).
- Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1.8 g).
- Rotella has 97% more protein (3.7 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Rotella lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Rotella
molasses sugar syrup, wheat flour, glucose syrup, starch, liquorice extract (1,4%), maltodextrin, salt, natural aroma of star anise, coating agents: white and yellow beeswax, carnauba wax, keep away from heat and moisture,
Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g
Sucre, maltodextrine, fructose, épaississant: gomme arabique; amidon de riz, anti-agglomérant: sels de magnésium d'acides gras; arômes, huile essentielle de menthe, agent d'enrobage: cire de carnauba.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rotella or Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g?
Overall, Rotella has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rotella has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rotella has less sugar: 38 g versus 94.5 g per 100 g.