Comparison

Ricola Eucalyptus vs Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g

Overall, Ricola Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRicola EucalyptusBonbons Tic Tac x110 pastill...
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 392 kcal 397 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 94.5 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.1 g
Additives23
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ricola Eucalyptus has no fat, while Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g has 0.5 g.
  • Ricola Eucalyptus has no saturated fat, while Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g has 0.5 g.
  • Ricola Eucalyptus has no sugar, while Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g has 94.5 g.
  • Ricola Eucalyptus has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ricola Eucalyptus

Édulcorant (isomalt), huiles essentielles de menthe poivrée et menthe, huile essentielle d’eucalyptus, extrait (0,2 %) d’eucalyptus et du mélange de 13 plantes Ricola, menthol, extrait-couleur de spiruline, extrait-couleur de carotte, édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia),

Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g

Sucre, maltodextrine, fructose, épaississant: gomme arabique; amidon de riz, anti-agglomérant: sels de magnésium d'acides gras; arômes, huile essentielle de menthe, agent d'enrobage: cire de carnauba.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ricola Eucalyptus or Bonbons Tic Tac x110 pastilles MENTHE - 54g?

Overall, Ricola Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ricola Eucalyptus has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ricola Eucalyptus has less sugar: 0 g versus 94.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons