Bonbon à la Sève de Pin vs Ricola Eucalyptus
Overall, Ricola Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonbon à la Sève de Pin | Ricola Eucalyptus |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 74 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ricola Eucalyptus has no sugar, while Bonbon à la Sève de Pin has 74 g.
- Ricola Eucalyptus has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bonbon à la Sève de Pin
Sucre, sirop de glucose, miel, menthol, huiles essentielles (eucalyptus, pin), mélasses, extrait de réglisse.
Ricola Eucalyptus
Édulcorant (isomalt), huiles essentielles de menthe poivrée et menthe, huile essentielle d’eucalyptus, extrait (0,2 %) d’eucalyptus et du mélange de 13 plantes Ricola, menthol, extrait-couleur de spiruline, extrait-couleur de carotte, édulcorant (glycosides de stéviol issus de Stevia),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonbon à la Sève de Pin or Ricola Eucalyptus?
Overall, Ricola Eucalyptus has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bonbon à la Sève de Pin has fewer calories: 390 kcal versus 392 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ricola Eucalyptus has less sugar: 0 g versus 74 g per 100 g.