Comparison
Rote Speisezwiebeln vs Cipolla rossa estiva
Overall, Rote Speisezwiebeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rote Speisezwiebeln | Cipolla rossa estiva |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 30 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 5.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cipolla rossa estiva has 22% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 39 kcal).
- Cipolla rossa estiva has 84% less fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Rote Speisezwiebeln has 16% less sugar (4.8 g vs 5.7 g).
- Rote Speisezwiebeln has 41% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1 g).
- Rote Speisezwiebeln has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Rote Speisezwiebeln
Zwiebeln
Cipolla rossa estiva
CIPOLLA ROSSA ESTIVA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rote Speisezwiebeln or Cipolla rossa estiva?
Overall, Rote Speisezwiebeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cipolla rossa estiva has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Speisezwiebeln has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.7 g per 100 g.