Comparison

Roses des Sables vs Rose des Sables

Overall, Rose des Sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoses des SablesRose des Sables
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 506 kcal 481 kcal
Fat 24.7 g 22 g
Saturated fat 14.4 g 13 g
Sugars 46 g 28 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.4 g
Fiber — 3 g
Protein 6.4 g 6 g
Additives32
AllergensGluten, Milk, Nuts, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Rose des Sables has 11% less fat (22 g vs 24.7 g).
  • Rose des Sables has 39% less sugar (28 g vs 46 g).
  • Only Roses des Sables lists: Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Roses des Sables

72% couverture de chocolat au lait : sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ entier en poudre, pâte de cacao, _lactosérum_, matière grasse de _lait_ anhydre, émulsifiant (lécithine de _soja_), arôme de vanilline; 22% flocons de maïs : farine de maïs, sucre, set et extrait de malt d'_orge_, émulsifiant (E471); 3% _amandes_; 3% Huile de tournesol. CACAO 30% MINIMUM

Rose des Sables

Maïs, sucre, pâte de cacao, beurre de cacao, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, émulsifiant (lécithines (soja)), arôme.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roses des Sables or Rose des Sables?

Overall, Rose des Sables has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rose des Sables has fewer calories: 481 kcal versus 506 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rose des Sables has less sugar: 28 g versus 46 g per 100 g.

More comparisons