Comparison

Rootbeer probiotic soda vs Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón

Overall, Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRootbeer probiotic sodaAgua mineral natural con gas...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 11 kcal 5 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 1.4 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.5 g —
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives15
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has 56% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 11 kcal).
  • Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has no sugar, while Rootbeer probiotic soda has 1.4 g.

Ingredients

Rootbeer probiotic soda

Carbonated Water, Organic Tibicos (Water, Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Tibicos Cultures), Organic Inulin, Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Apple Juice Concentrate, Organic Root Beer Flavor, Organic Stevia, Organic Lemon Juice Concentrate, Organic Vanilla Extract, Organic Monk Fruit Extract, Tartaric Acid, Sea Salt

Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón

CARBONATED NATURAL MINERAL WATER, LEMON JUICE FROM CONCENTRATE CH) AOD (CITRIC ACID), STABILISERS (E-414, E-445), SWEETENERS (STEVIOL GLUCOSIDES, ACESULFAME WLOSE) NATURAL FLAVOR; ANTIOXIDANT (ASCORBIC ACID), PRESERVATIVE (POTASSIUM SORBATE)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rootbeer probiotic soda or Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón?

Overall, Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons