Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón vs Appel perzik tintelfruit
Overall, Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón
Appel perzik tintelfruit
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Agua mineral natural con gas... | Appel perzik tintelfruit |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 5 kcal | 23 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has 78% fewer calories (5 kcal vs 23 kcal).
- Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has no sugar, while Appel perzik tintelfruit has 5.3 g.
Ingredients
Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón
CARBONATED NATURAL MINERAL WATER, LEMON JUICE FROM CONCENTRATE CH) AOD (CITRIC ACID), STABILISERS (E-414, E-445), SWEETENERS (STEVIOL GLUCOSIDES, ACESULFAME WLOSE) NATURAL FLAVOR; ANTIOXIDANT (ASCORBIC ACID), PRESERVATIVE (POTASSIUM SORBATE)
Appel perzik tintelfruit
Licht koolzuurhoudend water, 18% vruchtensap uit concentraat (94% appel, 6% perzik), fructosestroop, suiker, voedingszuur: citroenzuur, natuurlijke aroma’s, vitamine C.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón or Appel perzik tintelfruit?
Overall, Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has fewer calories: 5 kcal versus 23 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Agua mineral natural con gas sabor limón has less sugar: 0 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.