Comparison
Rondele vs SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao
Overall, Rondele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Better choice
Rondele
Sanovita · 80 g,
SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao
Sanovita · 75 g,
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rondele | SanoVita Rondele din orez ex... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 374 kcal | 455 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 21.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 20.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 18.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rondele has 18% fewer calories (374 kcal vs 455 kcal).
- Rondele has 96% less fat (0.9 g vs 21.3 g).
- Rondele has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 20.5 g).
- Rondele has no sugar, while SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao has 18.6 g.
- SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao has 44% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1.4 g).
- Rondele has 62% more protein (13.5 g vs 5.1 g).
- Rondele has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Rondele
Grau integral expandat.
SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao
Orez expandat, glazura de cacao (zahar, ulei vegetal, cacao pudra 9%, emulsificator: lecitina din soia, aroma de vanilie),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rondele or SanoVita Rondele din orez expandat cu glazura de cacao?
Overall, Rondele has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rondele has fewer calories: 374 kcal versus 455 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rondele has less sugar: 0 g versus 18.6 g per 100 g.