Comparison
Rode Uien vs Rote Speisezwiebeln
Overall, Rote Speisezwiebeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rode Uien | Rote Speisezwiebeln |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 39 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 5.9 g | 4.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rote Speisezwiebeln has 19% less sugar (4.8 g vs 5.9 g).
- Rote Speisezwiebeln has 35% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Rode Uien
Rode uien
Rote Speisezwiebeln
Zwiebeln
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rode Uien or Rote Speisezwiebeln?
Overall, Rote Speisezwiebeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rote Speisezwiebeln has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rote Speisezwiebeln has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 5.9 g per 100 g.