Comparison

Rode currysoep vs Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep

Overall, Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRode currysoepEitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 66 kcal 67 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.9 g
Sugars 2.7 g 4.1 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.5 g
Protein 2.4 g 3.4 g
Additives20
AllergensCelery, Fish, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep has 35% less fat (2.4 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Rode currysoep has 34% less sugar (2.7 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep has 67% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep has 29% more protein (3.4 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Only Rode currysoep lists: Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Rode currysoep

Water, groenten 12,3% (tomatenpuree, rode paprika, lente-ui, sjalot), kippenvlees 5%, raapzaadolie, KARNEMELKPOEDER,gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, kokosmelk 1,4%, TARWEBLOEM, suiker, wortelsapconcentraat, zout, specerijen (gember, knoflook, koriander,komijn), kruiden (korianderblad, limoenblad), gistextract (bevat GERST), stabilisator (E451, E452), VISPOEDER, fructose, aroma,maltodextrine, balsamicoazijn (wijnazijn, druivenmost), witte wijnextract.Kan ei, selderij,mosterd bevatten.E = door de E.G. goedgekeurde hulpstof.

Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rode currysoep or Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep?

Overall, Eitwitrijke Curry Kokossoep has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Rode currysoep has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 67 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rode currysoep has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons