Rochers coco vs Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rochers coco | Crimbles Coconut Macarons IM... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 442 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 21.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 19.8 g |
| Sugars | 39 g | 41 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 4.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 4.1 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | Eggs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rochers coco has 26% more fiber (4.2 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Rochers coco
Sucre, noix de coco 28%. eau, farine de riz, blancs d'oeufs 8%, sirop de sucre inverti, flocons de pomme de terre, sirop de glucose, sucre vanillé (Sucre, arôme naturel de vanille), arôme naturel de noix de coco.
Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP
Kokosnoot 30%, suiker, glucosestroop, kippenei-eiwit, aardappelzetmeel, dextrose, rijstmeel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rochers coco or Crimbles Coconut Macarons IMP?
Overall, Rochers coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rochers coco has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rochers coco has less sugar: 39 g versus 41 g per 100 g.