Robiola leggera vs 2 Robiola osella
Overall, Robiola leggera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Robiola leggera | 2 Robiola osella |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 327 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | — |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 6.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Robiola leggera has 24% fewer calories (249 kcal vs 327 kcal).
- Robiola leggera has 31% less fat (22 g vs 32 g).
- Robiola leggera has 35% less saturated fat (15 g vs 23 g).
- 2 Robiola osella has 32% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Robiola leggera has 23% more protein (8.3 g vs 6.4 g).
Ingredients
Robiola leggera
Latte pastorizzato, panna, sale
2 Robiola osella
LATTE pastorizzato, PANNA, sale DICHIARAZIONE NUTRIZIONALC valori medi per 1009 CARNOIDRATI 1399 kJ/327 kcal ENE 32 g GRASSI di cui acidi grass satur 239 3,1g 1,5g 6,4 g SIALLE 0,66 g
FAQ
Which is healthier: Robiola leggera or 2 Robiola osella?
Overall, Robiola leggera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Robiola leggera has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 327 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
2 Robiola osella has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.