Comparison
Robiola leggera vs Robiola
Overall, Robiola leggera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Robiola leggera | Robiola |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 249 kcal | 309 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | — |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Robiola leggera has 19% fewer calories (249 kcal vs 309 kcal).
- Robiola leggera has 27% less fat (22 g vs 30 g).
- Robiola leggera has 32% less saturated fat (15 g vs 22 g).
Ingredients
Robiola leggera
Latte pastorizzato, panna, sale
Robiola
Latte, crema di latte, sale, fermenti lattic
FAQ
Which is healthier: Robiola leggera or Robiola?
Overall, Robiola leggera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Robiola leggera has fewer calories: 249 kcal versus 309 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Robiola leggera has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.