Comparison

Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial vs Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent

Overall, Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientRobinsons Blackberry, Cranbe...Double Strength Apple And Bl...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 18 kcal 2 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0 g
Additives08
AllergensNone listedApple

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has 89% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 18 kcal).
  • Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has no sugar, while Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has 0.9 g.
  • Only Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent lists: Apple.

Ingredients

Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial

mun crate pros information per 100ml dilatedt which sugars 7563

Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent

Water, Fruit Juices from Concentrate (Apple 18%, Blackcurrant 2%), Acids (Citric Acid, Malic Acid), Natural Flavouring, Acidity Regulator (Sodium Citrate), Concentrates (Carrot, Apple, Blueberry, Hibiscus), Sweeteners (Acesulfame K, Sucralose), Preservatives (Potassium Sorbate, Sodium Metabisulphite), Stabiliser (Cellulose Gum)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial or Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent?

Overall, Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 18 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Double Strength Apple And Blackcurrent has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons