Comparison

Chicken Tikka Samosa vs Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial

Overall, Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChicken Tikka SamosaRobinsons Blackberry, Cranbe...
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — —
Calories 228 kcal 18 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0 g
Sugars 3.2 g 0.9 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.3 g 0 g
Protein 9.2 g 0.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has 92% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 228 kcal).
  • Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has no fat, while Chicken Tikka Samosa has 9.3 g.
  • Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has no saturated fat, while Chicken Tikka Samosa has 1.1 g.
  • Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has 71% less sugar (0.9 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Chicken Tikka Samosa has 100% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0 g).
  • Chicken Tikka Samosa has 99% more protein (9.2 g vs 0.1 g).

Ingredients

Chicken Tikka Samosa

Not available.

Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial

mun crate pros information per 100ml dilatedt which sugars 7563

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chicken Tikka Samosa or Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial?

Overall, Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 228 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Robinsons Blackberry, Cranberry and Sloe fruit cordial has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 3.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons