Comparison
Riz complet vs Riz complet
Overall, Riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz complet | Riz complet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 355 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 3.7 g | 7.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz complet has 54% fewer calories (163 kcal vs 355 kcal).
- Riz complet has 50% more protein (7.4 g vs 3.7 g).
- Riz complet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Riz complet
Riz, huile de tournesol
Riz complet
riz long grain complet étuvé de qualité supérieure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz complet or Riz complet?
Overall, Riz complet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz complet has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 355 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz complet has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.