Comparison
Riz carnaroli vs Carnaroli
Overall, Riz carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz carnaroli | Carnaroli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz carnaroli has 29% more fiber (1.4 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Riz carnaroli
Riz Carnaroli.
Carnaroli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz carnaroli or Carnaroli?
Overall, Riz carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riz carnaroli has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz carnaroli has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.2 g per 100 g.