Comparison
Riso carnaroli vs Carnaroli
Overall, Carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riso carnaroli | Carnaroli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 348 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carnaroli has 75% less fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
- Carnaroli has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Carnaroli has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Carnaroli has 30% more fiber (1 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Riso carnaroli
Riso carnaroli
Carnaroli
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riso carnaroli or Carnaroli?
Overall, Carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso carnaroli has fewer calories: 348 kcal versus 354 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Carnaroli has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.