Riz carnaroli vs Riso carnaroli
Overall, Riz carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riz carnaroli | Riso carnaroli |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 349 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 7.4 g | 7.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riz carnaroli has 63% less fat (0.6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Riz carnaroli has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Riz carnaroli has no sugar, while Riso carnaroli has 0.5 g.
- Riz carnaroli has 50% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.7 g).
Ingredients
Riz carnaroli
Riz Carnaroli.
Riso carnaroli
100 g of roduct/Valores nutritionales medios por 100 e producto crudo/ Durchschnittliche Nährwerte ro 100 g del Rohprodukts/Valeurs nutritionelles moyennes pour 100 g de produit cru: nergia/Energy/Valor energético/1478 kj nergie/Energie Grassi / Fat / Grasas / Fett / Graisses Hi cui/of which/de las cuales/
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riz carnaroli or Riso carnaroli?
Overall, Riz carnaroli has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riso carnaroli has fewer calories: 349 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Riz carnaroli has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.