Comparison

Riz au lait Saveur Vanille vs Pâte à pizza

Overall, Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRiz au lait Saveur VanillePâte à pizza
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 143 kcal 292 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 6.7 g
Saturated fat 2.3 g 0.6 g
Sugars 15.4 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.9 g
Fiber 0.1 g 1.6 g
Protein 2.8 g 7.2 g
Additives24
AllergensMilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has 51% fewer calories (143 kcal vs 292 kcal).
  • Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has 49% less fat (3.4 g vs 6.7 g).
  • Pâte à pizza has 74% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Pâte à pizza has 94% less sugar (0.9 g vs 15.4 g).
  • Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has 91% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Pâte à pizza has 94% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Pâte à pizza has 61% more protein (7.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pâte à pizza lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Riz au lait Saveur Vanille

_Lait_ entier (65,4%), sirop de glucose, riz (10,0%), eau, _crème_ (_lait_), sucre, sel, émulsifiant (E471), arôme vanille, colorant (rocou)

Pâte à pizza

PÂTE À PIZZA - 63,7 % farine de BLÉ (gluten), eau, huile de colza, alcool éthylique, sel, poudres à lever (E450, E500), épaississant (E412), levure désactivée, levure. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES DE LAIT.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Riz au lait Saveur Vanille or Pâte à pizza?

Overall, Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Riz au lait Saveur Vanille has fewer calories: 143 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pâte à pizza has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 15.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons