Rindersaftschinken vs Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Rindersaftschinken
Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rindersaftschinken | Saucisses knacks de Strasbou... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 102 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 3 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rindersaftschinken has 60% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- Rindersaftschinken has 91% less fat (2 g vs 23 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 90% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 8.6 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 29% less sugar (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g has 14% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
- Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has 45% more protein (20 g vs 11 g).
- Rindersaftschinken has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rindersaftschinken
Rindfleisch, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Dextrose, Gewürzextrakte, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbat; Stabilisator: Triphosphate; Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Buchenholzrauch. Kann Spuren von Senf und Sellerie enthalten.
Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g
Viande de porc (origine France) 75%, eau, gras de porc (origine France), sel, saccharose, arômes naturels, PROTÉINES DE LAIT, fibres de carotte, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, conservateur : nitrite de sodium, ferments. Fumage au bois de hêtre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rindersaftschinken or Saucisses knacks de Strasbourg JEAN FLOCH x10 350g?
Overall, Rindersaftschinken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rindersaftschinken has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rindersaftschinken has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.