Comparison

Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk. vs Puten Käsekrainer

Overall, Puten Käsekrainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk.Puten Käsekrainer
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 299 kcal 199 kcal
Fat 25 g 15 g
Saturated fat 12.6 g 4.9 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.5 g
Salt 2 g 2.3 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 18.2 g 16 g
Additives03
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Puten Käsekrainer has 33% fewer calories (199 kcal vs 299 kcal).
  • Puten Käsekrainer has 40% less fat (15 g vs 25 g).
  • Puten Käsekrainer has 61% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk. has 12% more protein (18.2 g vs 16 g).
  • Puten Käsekrainer has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk. is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk.

Rindfleisch* 73%, Rinderfett*, EMMENTALER KÄSE ( KUHMILCH*, Speisesalz, MILCHSÄUREKULTUREN, MIKROBIELLES LAB ), Trinkwasser, Pfeffer*, Zwiebel*, Acerolapulver*, Koriander*, Rosmarin, Kümmel*, Muskatnuss*, Rohrohrzucker*, Knoblauch*, Steinsalz, Rote Bete, Schafsaitling, Buchenholzrauch * = Zutaten aus ökologischem Landbau

Puten Käsekrainer

Putenfleisch, Emmentaler, Putenfett, Hühnerfett, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Zucker, Gewürzextrakte, Stabilisator: Diphosphate, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Antioxidations mittel: Ascorbinsäure; Schafsaitling,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk. or Puten Käsekrainer?

Overall, Puten Käsekrainer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Puten Käsekrainer has fewer calories: 199 kcal versus 299 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rinderkäsekrainer, 3 Stk. has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons