Comparison

Rillettes poulet rôti vs Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik

Overall, Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes poulet rôtiCremiger Hühneraufstrich, Kl...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 330 kcal 78 kcal
Fat 29 g 3 g
Saturated fat 9.2 g 3.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.6 g
Salt 1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 0 g 2 g
Protein 16.8 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has 76% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 330 kcal).
  • Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has 90% less fat (3 g vs 29 g).
  • Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has 62% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has 100% more fiber (2 g vs 0 g).
  • Rillettes poulet rôti has 40% more protein (16.8 g vs 10 g).
  • Rillettes poulet rôti is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Rillettes poulet rôti

chicken meat of french origin 90%, duck fat, carrots, salt, honey, alcohol vinegar, spices and aromatic plants,

Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik

Hühnerbrühe ( Wasser, Suppenhuhn), 30% gekochtes Hühnerfleisch, Sonnenblumenöl, 3,4 % Milcheiweiß, Sojaeiweiß, Kartoffelstärke, Maisstärke, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Paprikaextrakt

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes poulet rôti or Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik?

Overall, Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cremiger Hühneraufstrich, Klassik has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 330 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Rillettes poulet rôti has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons