Comparison
Rik & Rok vs Seedless Red Grapes
Overall, Seedless Red Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rik & Rok | Seedless Red Grapes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 15.5 g | 15.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Seedless Red Grapes has 68% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
Ingredients
Rik & Rok
Raisin
Seedless Red Grapes
Red grapes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rik & Rok or Seedless Red Grapes?
Overall, Seedless Red Grapes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Seedless Red Grapes has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rik & Rok has less sugar: 15.5 g versus 15.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Raisin sans pépin vs Seedless Red Grapes
Rik & Rok vs Raisin sans pépin
Tafeltrauben kernlos vs Seedless Red Grapes
Rik & Rok vs Tafeltrauben kernlos
Chasselas de Moissac vs Seedless Red Grapes
Rik & Rok vs Chasselas de Moissac
Raisin Rouge Sans Pépins vs Seedless Red Grapes
Raisin Rouge Sans Pépins vs Rik & Rok