Comparison
Riesling Trocken vs Sauvignon Blanc
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Riesling Trocken | Sauvignon Blanc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 6 kcal | 8 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riesling Trocken has no fat, while Sauvignon Blanc has 0.5 g.
- Riesling Trocken has no saturated fat, while Sauvignon Blanc has 0.5 g.
- Sauvignon Blanc has 84% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Sauvignon Blanc has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Riesling Trocken
Not available.
Sauvignon Blanc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Riesling Trocken or Sauvignon Blanc?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Riesling Trocken has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 8 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sauvignon Blanc has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.