Remoulade vs Salsa di pere candite
Overall, Salsa di pere candite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Remoulade | Salsa di pere candite |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 600 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 64 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.7 g | 66 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Mustard | Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa di pere candite has 52% fewer calories (287 kcal vs 600 kcal).
- Salsa di pere candite has 100% less fat (0.3 g vs 64 g).
- Salsa di pere candite has no saturated fat, while Remoulade has 4.6 g.
- Remoulade has 94% less sugar (3.7 g vs 66 g).
- Salsa di pere candite has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Remoulade has 67% more protein (0.6 g vs 0.2 g).
- Remoulade is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Remoulade lists: Eggs.
- Only Salsa di pere candite lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Remoulade
Rapsöl 65%, Wasser, Branntweinessig, _Senf_ (Wasser, _Senfsaaten_, Branntweinessig, Salz, Gewürze), Zucker, _Eigelb_ 2,2%, Kräuter, Stärke, Salz, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure, Antioxidationsmittel Calcium-Dinatrium-EDTA
Salsa di pere candite
Pere 54%, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio, aroma senape, antiossidante: anidride solforosa.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Remoulade or Salsa di pere candite?
Overall, Salsa di pere candite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa di pere candite has fewer calories: 287 kcal versus 600 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Remoulade has less sugar: 3.7 g versus 66 g per 100 g.