Comparison
Remolacha rallada en hilos vs Remolacha rallada
Overall, Remolacha rallada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Remolacha rallada en hilos | Remolacha rallada |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 35 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.2 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 1.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Remolacha rallada has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Remolacha rallada has 32% less sugar (4.2 g vs 6.2 g).
- Remolacha rallada has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Remolacha rallada en hilos has 53% more protein (1.5 g vs 0.7 g).
- Remolacha rallada has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Remolacha rallada en hilos
Not available.
Remolacha rallada
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Remolacha rallada en hilos or Remolacha rallada?
Overall, Remolacha rallada has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Remolacha rallada has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 35 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Remolacha rallada has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha rallada en hil...
Buraczki zasmażane z ceb... vs Remolacha rallada
Sliced Beets vs Remolacha rallada
Sliced Beets vs Remolacha rallada en hil...
Remolacha rallada en hil... vs Remolacha en rodajas
Remolacha en rodajas vs Remolacha rallada
Remolacha roja en rodaja... vs Remolacha rallada en hil...
Remolacha roja en rodaja... vs Remolacha rallada