Reisflocken vs Kellogs azzurro
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Reisflocken | Kellogs azzurro |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 2.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 7.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kellogs azzurro has 45% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Reisflocken has 91% less sugar (0.7 g vs 7.9 g).
- Reisflocken has no salt, while Kellogs azzurro has 1 g.
- Kellogs azzurro has 24% more fiber (2.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Reisflocken has 10% more protein (7.8 g vs 7 g).
- Reisflocken has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Reisflocken
Reisflocken
Kellogs azzurro
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Reisflocken or Kellogs azzurro?
Overall, Reisflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Reisflocken has fewer calories: 352 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Reisflocken has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 7.9 g per 100 g.