Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g vs Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g
Overall, Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g
Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajad... | Avena San Fernando tetrapack... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 100 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has 72% fewer calories (100 kcal vs 361 kcal).
- Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has 60% less saturated fat (2 g vs 5 g).
- Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g has no sugar, while Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has 6 g.
- Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g has 88% more protein (26 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g
Not available.
Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g or Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g?
Overall, Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Avena San Fernando tetrapack x345g has fewer calories: 100 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Queso sabana Alpina 25 tajadas x400g has less sugar: 0 g versus 6 g per 100 g.